Anna Giardini, Marcella Ottonello, Carlo Pasetti, Deborah Jean Pain, Inés Giorgi
Many steps forward within the legal field to facilitate end-of-life communication have been taken, but Mediterranean countries can be considered as a step back. Aim of our observational cross-sectional study is to observe disease awareness, know- ledge of clinical procedures and of advanced directives in patients with chronic progressive diseases in Italy. Methods. 115 subjects (23 with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis – ALS , 30 with Chronic Heart Failure – CHF , 32 with Chronic Kidney Failure – CKF , and 30 with Advanced Cancer – AC ) were assessed on health literacy, their right to be informed and meaning of Advance Directives ( AD ) and of Advance Declaration of Treatment ( ADT ). Results. 86% of patients claimed the right to know diagnosis and prognosis and to be informed of disease progression. Patients did not know the meaning of invasive therapy (52%) and of aggressive treatment (81%). 72% did not know the meaning of AD and of ADT ; 94% be- lieved that AD or ADT could partially or totally guarantee patient’s will to make decisions on end-of-life, with frequency difference on AD or ADT efficiency between CHF and ALS patients (p=.01). Once informed on the definitions of AD (legally binding) and ADT (not legally binding), ALS patients preferred legally binding directives, compared to patients with AC and with CHF ( ALS vs CHF p=.005;
ALS vs AC p=.001). Patients with CKF would prefer legally binding proposal compared to CHF patients (p=.02).
To inform and to guide patients from diagnosis to end-of-life should be an integral part of medical practice.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados