Skip to main content
Log in

Chern characters for twisted matrix factorizations and the vanishing of the higher Herbrand difference

  • Published:
Selecta Mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a theory of “ad hoc” Chern characters for twisted matrix factorizations associated to a scheme X, a line bundle \(\mathcal {L}\), and a regular global section \(W \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal {L})\). As an application, we establish the vanishing, in certain cases, of \(h_c^R(M,N)\), the higher Herbrand difference, and, \(\eta _c^R(M,N)\), the higher codimensional analogue of Hochster’s theta pairing, where R is a complete intersection of codimension c with isolated singularities and M and N are finitely generated R-modules. Specifically, we prove such vanishing if \(R = Q/(f_1, \dots , f_c)\) has only isolated singularities, Q is a smooth k-algebra, k is a field of characteristic 0, the \(f_i\)’s form a regular sequence, and \(c \ge 2\). Such vanishing was previously established in the general characteristic, but graded, setting in Moore et al. (Math Z 273(3–4):907–920, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atiyah, M.F.: Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 85, 181–207 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchweitz, R.O.: Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology over Gorenstein rings, unpublished. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/16682 (1987)

  3. Buchweitz, R.-O., Flenner, H.: A semiregularity map for modules and applications to deformations. Compos. Math. 137(2), 135–210 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchweitz, R.-O., Van Straten, D.: An index theorem for modules on a hypersurface singularity. Mosc. Math. J. 12(2), 237–259 (2012). 459

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Burke, J., Walker, M.E.: Matrix factorizations over projective schemes. Homol. Homot. Appl. 14(2), 37–61 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke, J., Walker, M.E.: Matrix factorizations in higher codimension. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 367(5), 3323–3370 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Celikbas, O.: Vanishing of Tor over complete intersections. J. Commut. Algebra 3(2), 169–206 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Celikbas, O., Dao, H.: Asymptotic behavior of Ext functors for modules of finite complete intersection dimension. Math. Z. 269(3–4), 1005–1020 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hailong D: Asymptotic behavior of Tor over complete intersections and applications. ArXiv e-prints (2007)

  10. Dao, H.: Some observations on local and projective hypersurfaces. Math. Res. Lett. 15(2), 207–219 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dao, H.: Decent intersection and Tor-rigidity for modules over local hypersurfaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 365(6), 2803–2821 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dao, H., Kurano, K.: Hochster’s theta pairing and numerical equivalence. J. K-Theory 14(3), 495–525 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyckerhoff, T.: Compact generators in categories of matrix factorizations. Duke Math. J. 159(2), 223–274 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dyckerhoff, T., Murfet, D.: The Kapustin–Li formula revisited. Adv. Math. 231(3–4), 1858–1885 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dyckerhoff, T., Murfet, D.: Pushing forward matrix factorizations. Duke Math. J. 162(7), 1249–1311 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenbud, D.: Homological algebra on a complete intersection, with an application to group representations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 260(1), 35–64 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic geometry. Springer, New York (1977). Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hochster, M: The dimension of an intersection in an ambient hypersurface, algebraic geometry (Chicago, Ill., 1980), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 862, pp. 93–106. Springer, Berlin (1981)

  19. Huneke, C., Jorgensen, D.A.: Symmetry in the vanishing of Ext over Gorenstein rings. Math. Scand. 93(2), 161–184 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Illusie, Luc: Complexe cotangent et déformations. I, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 239, Springer, Berlin (1971)

  21. Jorgensen, D.A.: Complexity and Tor on a complete intersection. J. Algebra 211(2), 578–598 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapustin, A., Li, Y.: D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models and algebraic geometry. J. High Energy Phys. 12(005), 44 (2003). (electronic)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, K.H., Pomerleano, D.: Global matrix factorizations. Math. Res. Lett. 20(1), 91–106 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Markarian, N.: The Atiyah class, Hochschild cohomology and the Riemann–Roch theorem. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 79(1), 129–143 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore, W.F., Piepmeyer, G., Spiroff, S., Walker, M.E.: Hochster’s theta invariant and the Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations. Adv. Math. 226(2), 1692–1714 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore, W.F., Piepmeyer, G., Spiroff, S., Walker, M.E.: The vanishing of a higher codimension analogue of Hochster’s theta invariant. Math. Z. 273(3–4), 907–920 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Murfet, D.: Residues and duality for singularity categories of isolated Gorenstein singularities. Compos. Math. 149(12), 2071–2100 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Orlov, D: Matrix factorizations for nonaffine LG-models, Math. Ann. 353(1), 95–108 (2012). doi:10.1007/s00208-011-0676-x

  29. Orlov, D.: Triangulated categories of singularities, and equivalences between Landau–Ginzburg models. Math. Sb. 197(12), 117–132 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Platt, D: Chern character for global matrix factorizations, Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of Oregon, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor (2013)

  31. Polishchuk, A., Vaintrob, A.: Matrix factorizations and singularity categories for stacks. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61(7), 2609–2642 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Polishchuk, A., Vaintrob, A.: Chern characters and Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula for matrix factorizations. Duke Math. J. 161(10), 1863–1926 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Positselski, L: Coherent analogues of matrix factorizations and relative singularity categories. arXiv:1102.0261

  34. Preygel, A.: Thom–Sebastiani and Duality for Matrix Factorizations. ArXiv e-prints (2011)

  35. Segal, E.: The closed state space of affine Landau–Ginzburg B-models. J. Noncommut. Geom. 7(3), 857–883 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Mark, E.: Walker. On the vanishing of Hochster’s theta invariant, ArXiv e-prints (2014)

  37. Xuan, Y: Geometric study of the category of matrix factorizations. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathstudent/45 (2013)

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Jesse Burke, Olgur Celikbas, Hailong Dao, Daniel Murfet and Roger Wiegand for conversations about the topics of this paper and to the anonymous referee for some helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Walker.

Additional information

The author was supported in part by National Science Foundation Award DMS-0966600.

Appendix: Relative connections

Appendix: Relative connections

We record here some well-known facts concerning connections for locally free coherent sheaves. Throughout, S is a Noetherian, separated scheme and \(p: X \rightarrow S\) is a smooth morphism; i.e., p is separated, flat and of finite type and \(\Omega ^1_{X/S}\) is locally free.

Definition 6.1

For a vector bundle (i.e., locally free coherent sheaf) \(\mathcal {E}\) on X, a connection on \(\mathcal {E}\) relative to p is a map of sheaves of abelian groups

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla : \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \Omega ^1_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}\end{aligned}$$

on X satisfying the Leibnitz rule on sections: given an open subset \(U \subseteq X\) and elements \(f \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal {O}_X)\) and \(e \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal {E})\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla (f \cdot e) = df \otimes e + f \nabla (e) \, \text { in } \Gamma (U, \Omega ^1_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}), \end{aligned}$$

where \(d: \mathcal {O}_X \rightarrow \Omega ^1_{X/S}\) denotes exterior differentiation relative to p.

Note that the hypotheses imply that \(\nabla \) is \(\mathcal {O}_S\)-linear — more precisely, \(p_*(\nabla ): p_* \mathcal {E}\rightarrow p_*\left( \Omega ^1_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}\right) \) is a morphism of quasi-coherent sheaves on S.

1.1 The classical Atiyah class

Let \(\Delta : X \rightarrow X \times _S X\) be the diagonal map, which, since \(X \rightarrow S\) is separated, is a closed immersion, and let \(\mathcal {I}\) denote the sheaf of ideals cutting out \(\Delta (X)\). Since p is smooth, \(\mathcal {I}\) is locally generated by a regular sequence. Recall that \(\mathcal {I}/\mathcal {I}^2 \cong \Delta _* \Omega ^1_{X/S}\). Consider the coherent sheaf \(\tilde{\mathcal {P}}_{X/S} := \mathcal {O}_{X \times _S X}/\mathcal {I}^2\) on \(X \times _S X\). Observe that \(\tilde{\mathcal {P}}_{X/S}\) is supported on \(\Delta (X)\), so that \((\pi _i)_* \tilde{\mathcal {P}}_{X/S}\) is a coherent sheaf on X, for \(i = 1, 2\), where \(\pi _i: X \times _S X \rightarrow X\) denotes projection onto the i-th factor.

The two push-forwards \((\pi _i)_* \tilde{\mathcal {P}}_{X/S}\), \(i = 1,2\) are canonically isomorphic as sheaves of abelian groups, but have different structures as \(\mathcal {O}_X\)-modules. We write \(\mathcal {P}_{X/S} = \mathcal {P}\) for the sheaf of abelian groups \((\pi _1)_* \tilde{\mathcal {P}}= (\pi _2)_* \tilde{\mathcal {P}}\) regarded as a \(\mathcal {O}_X-\mathcal {O}_X\)-bimodule where the left \(\mathcal {O}_X\)-module structure is given by identifying it with \((\pi _1)_* \tilde{\mathcal {P}}_{X/S}\) and the right \(\mathcal {O}_X\)-module structure is given by identifying it with \((\pi _2)_* \tilde{\mathcal {P}}_{X/S}\).

Locally on an affine open subset \(U = {\text {Spec}}(Q)\) of X lying over an affine open subset \(V = {\text {Spec}}(A)\) of S, we have \(\mathcal {P}_{U/V} = (Q \otimes _A Q)/I^2\), where \(I = {\text {ker}}(Q \otimes _A Q \xrightarrow {- \cdot -} Q)\) and the left and right Q-module structures are given in the obvious way.

There is an isomorphism of coherent sheaves on \(X \times X\)

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta _* \Omega ^1_{X/S} \cong \mathcal {I}/\mathcal {I}^2 \end{aligned}$$

given locally on generators by \(dg \mapsto g \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes g\). From this we obtain the short exact sequence

$$\begin{aligned} 0 \rightarrow \Omega _{X/S}^1 \rightarrow \mathcal {P}_{X/S} \rightarrow \mathcal {O}_X \rightarrow 0. \end{aligned}$$
(6.2)

This may be thought of as a sequence of \(\mathcal {O}_X-\mathcal {O}_X\)-bimodules, but for \(\Omega ^1_{X/S}\) and \(\mathcal {O}_X\) the two structures coincide.

Locally on open subsets U and V as above, we have \(\Omega ^1_{Q/A} \cong I/I^2\), and (6.2) takes the form

$$\begin{aligned} 0 \rightarrow I/I^2 \rightarrow (Q \otimes _A Q)/I^2 \rightarrow Q \rightarrow 0. \end{aligned}$$

Viewing (6.2) as either a sequence of left or right modules, it is a split exact sequence of locally free coherent sheaves on X. For example, a splitting of \(\mathcal {P}_{X/S} \rightarrow \mathcal {O}_X\) as right modules may be given as follows: recall that as a right module, \(\mathcal {P}_{X/S} = (\pi _2)_* \mathcal {P}\) and so a map of right modules \(\mathcal {O}_X \rightarrow \mathcal {P}_{X/S}\) is given by a map \(\pi _2^* \mathcal {O}_X \rightarrow \mathcal {P}_{X/S}\). Now, \(\pi _2^* \mathcal {O}_X = \mathcal {O}_{X \times _S X}\), and the map we use is the canonical surjection. We refer to this splitting as the canonical right splitting of (6.2).

Locally on subsets U and V as above, the canonical right splitting of is given by \(q \mapsto 1 \otimes q\).

Given a locally free coherent sheaf \(\mathcal {E}\) on X, we tensor (6.2) on the right by \(\mathcal {E}\) to obtain the short exact sequence

$$\begin{aligned} 0 \rightarrow \Omega _{X/S}^1 \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}\xrightarrow {i} \mathcal {P}_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}\xrightarrow {\pi } \mathcal {E}\rightarrow 0 \end{aligned}$$
(6.3)

of \(\mathcal {O}_X-\mathcal {O}_X\)-bimodules. Taking sections on affine open subsets U and V as before, letting \(E = \Gamma (U, \mathcal {E})\), this sequence has the form

$$\begin{aligned} 0 \rightarrow \Omega ^1_{Q/A} \otimes _Q E \rightarrow (Q \otimes _A E)/I^2 \cdot E \rightarrow E \rightarrow 0. \end{aligned}$$

Since (6.2) is split exact as a sequence of right modules and tensor product preserves split exact sequences, (6.3) is split exact as a sequence of right \(\mathcal {O}_X\)-modules, and the canonical right splitting of (6.2) determines a canonical right splitting of (6.3), which we write as

$$\begin{aligned} {\text {can}}: \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \mathcal {P}_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}. \end{aligned}$$

The map \({\text {can}}\) is given locally on sections by \(e \mapsto 1 \otimes e\).

In general, (6.3) need not split as a sequence of left modules. Viewed as a sequence of left modules, (6.3) determines an element of

$$\begin{aligned} {\text {Ext}}^1_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {E}, \Omega _{X/S}^1 \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}) \cong H^1(X, \Omega _{X/S}^1 \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} {\mathcal {E}}nd_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {E})), \end{aligned}$$

sometimes called the “Atiyah class” of \(\mathcal {E}\) relative to p. To distinguish this class from what we have called the Atiyah class of a matrix factorization in the body of this paper, we will call this class the classical Atiyah class of the vector bundle \(\mathcal {E}\), and we write it as

$$\begin{aligned} At^{\text {classical}}_{X/S}(\mathcal {E}) \in {\text {Ext}}^1_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {E}, \Omega _{X/S}^1 \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}). \end{aligned}$$

The sequence (6.3) splits as a sequence of left modules if and only if \(At^{\text {classical}}_{X/S} = 0\).

Remark 6.4

The classical Atiyah class was first introduced by Atiyah in [1]. The definition can be extended to a bounded complex of vector bundles; see, for example, [24, §1]. The Atiyah class of such a complex is analogous to the Atiyah class of a matrix factorization, found in Definition 2.14 in the body of this paper.

There is also a version of the Atiyah class in the non-smooth setting, in which \(\Omega ^1_X\) is replaced by the cotangent complex \({\mathbb {L}}_X\); this is due to Illusie [20]. See also the work of Buchweitz and Flenner [3], who develop a version of Illusie’s Atiyah class in the analytic setting.

Lemma 6.5

If \(p: X \rightarrow S\) is affine, then for any vector bundle \(\mathcal {E}\) on X \(At^{\text {classical}}_{X/S}(\mathcal {E}) = 0\) and hence (6.3) splits as a sequence of left modules.

Proof

Since p is affine, \(p_*\) is exact. Applying \(p_*\) to (6.3) results in a sequence of \(\mathcal {O}_S-\mathcal {O}_S\) bimodules (which are quasi-coherent for both actions). But since \(p \circ \pi _1 = p \circ \pi _2\) these two actions coincide. Moreover, since (6.3) splits as right modules, so does its push-forward along \(p_*\).

It thus suffices to prove the following general fact: if

$$\begin{aligned} F := (0 \rightarrow \mathcal {F}' \rightarrow \mathcal {F}\rightarrow \mathcal {F}'' \rightarrow 0) \end{aligned}$$

is a short exact sequence of vector bundles on X such that \(p_*(F)\) splits as a sequence of quasi-coherent sheaves on S, then F splits. To prove this, observe that F determines a class in \(H^1(X, {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {F}'', \mathcal {F}'))\) and it is split if and only if this class vanishes. We may identify \(H^1(X, {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {F}'', \mathcal {F}'))\) with \(H^1(S, p_* {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {F}'', \mathcal {F}'))\) since p is affine. Moreover, the class of \(F \in H^1(S, p_* {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {F}'', \mathcal {F}'))\) is the image of the class of \(p_*(F) \in H^1(S, {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_S}(p_* \mathcal {F}'', p_* \mathcal {F}'))\) under the map induced by the canonical map

$$\begin{aligned} {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_S}(p_* \mathcal {F}'', p_* \mathcal {F}') \rightarrow p_* {{\mathcal {H}{\text {om}}}}_{\mathcal {O}_X}(\mathcal {F}'', \mathcal {F}'). \end{aligned}$$

But by our assumption the class of \(p_*(F)\) vanishes since \(p_*F\) splits. \(\square \)

1.2 The vanishing of the classical Atiyah class and connections

Suppose \(\sigma : \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \mathcal {P}_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}\) is a splitting of the map \(\pi \) in (6.3) as left modules and recall \({\text {can}}: \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \mathcal {P}_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}\) is the splitting of \(\pi \) as a morphism of right modules given locally by \(e \mapsto 1 \otimes e\). Since \(\sigma \) and \({\text {can}}\) are splittings of the same map regarded as a map of sheaves of abelian groups, the difference \(\sigma - {\text {can}}\) factors as \(i \circ \nabla _\sigma \) for a unique map of sheaves of abelian groups

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla _\sigma : \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \Omega ^1_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {P}. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 6.6

The map \(\nabla _\sigma \) is a connection on \(\mathcal {E}\) relative to p.

Proof

The property of being a connection may be verified locally, in which case the result is well known.

In more detail, restricting to an affine open \(U = {\text {Spec}}(Q)\) of X lying over an affine open \(V = {\text {Spec}}(A)\) of S, we assume E is a projective Q-module and that we are given a splitting \(\sigma \) of the map of left Q-modules . The map \(\nabla _\sigma = (\sigma - {\text {can}})\) lands in \(I/I^2 \otimes _Q Q = \Omega ^1_{Q/A} \otimes _Q E\), and for \(a \in A, e \in E\) we have

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \nabla _\sigma (a e)&= \sigma (ae) - 1 \otimes ae \\&= a \sigma (e) -1 \otimes ae \\&= a\sigma (e) - a \otimes e + a \otimes e - 1 \otimes ae \\&= a (\sigma (e) - 1 \otimes e) + (a \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes a) \otimes e = a \nabla _\sigma (e) + da \otimes e, \\ \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

since da is identified with \(a \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes a\) under \(\Omega ^1_{Q/A} \cong I/I^2\). \(\square \)

Lemma 6.7

Suppose \(\mathcal {E}, \mathcal {E}'\) are locally free coherent sheaves on X and \(\nabla , \nabla '\) are connections for each relative to p. If \(g: \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \mathcal {E}'\) is a morphisms of coherent sheaves, then the map

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla ' \circ g - ({\text {id}}\otimes g) \circ \nabla : \mathcal {E}\rightarrow \Omega ^1_{X/S} \otimes _{\mathcal {O}_X} \mathcal {E}' \end{aligned}$$

is a morphism of coherent sheaves.

Proof

Given an open set U and elements \(f \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal {O}_X), e \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal {E})\), the displayed map sends \(f \cdot e \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal {E})\) to

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&\nabla '(g(fe)) - ({\text {id}}\otimes g)(df \otimes e - f \nabla (e) \\&\quad = \nabla '(fg(e)) - df \otimes g(e) - f ({\text {id}}\otimes g)(\nabla (e)) \\&\quad =df \otimes g(e) + f\nabla '(g(e)) - df \otimes g(e) - f ({\text {id}}\otimes g)(\nabla (e)) \\&\quad = f\nabla '(g(e)) - f ({\text {id}}\otimes g)(\nabla (e)) \\&\quad = f\left( \left( \nabla ' \circ g - ({\text {id}}\otimes g) \circ \nabla \right) (e) \right) . \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

The original, non-relative version of the following result is due to Atiyah; see [1, Theorem 2].

Proposition 6.8

For a vector bundle \(\mathcal {E}\) on X, the function \(\sigma \mapsto \nabla _\sigma \) determines a bijection between the set of splittings of the map \(\pi \) in (6.3) as a map of left modules and the set of connections on \(\mathcal {E}\) relative to p. In particular, \(\mathcal {E}\) admits a connection relative to p if and only if \(At^{\text {classical}}_{X/S}(\mathcal {E})= 0\).

Proof

From Lemma 6.7 with g being the identity map, the difference of two connections on \(\mathcal {E}\) is \(\mathcal {O}_X\)-linear. By choosing any one splitting \(\sigma _0\) of (6.3) and its associated connection \(\nabla _0 = \nabla _{\sigma _0}\), the inverse of

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma \mapsto \nabla _{\sigma } \end{aligned}$$

is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \nabla \mapsto \nabla - \nabla _{\sigma _0} + \sigma _0. \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walker, M.E. Chern characters for twisted matrix factorizations and the vanishing of the higher Herbrand difference. Sel. Math. New Ser. 22, 1749–1791 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-016-0231-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-016-0231-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation