This paper is a response to Niklas Möller�s (Philosophical Studies, 2013) recent criticism of our relational (Jazz) model of meaning of thin evaluative terms. Möller�s criticism rests on a confusion about the role of coordinating intentions in Jazz. This paper clarifies what�s distinctive and controversial about the Jazz proposal and explains why Jazz, unlike traditional accounts of meaning, is not committed to analycities.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados