- Palaeolithic Archaeology, Prehistoric Art, Prehistoric Rock Art, Origin of symbolic behaviour, Rock art chronology, Territorial organisation, and 17 moreTerritorial prehistory organisation, Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition, Paleolithic Europe, Middle Paleolithic, Ice Age Cave Art, Evolution and Human Behavior, Radiocarbon, Series De Uranio, Termoluminiscencia, Arte paleolítico, Cornisa Cantábica, Paleolithic Art, Direct Chronology, Magdalenian, Behavioral Ecology, Gravettian, and Aurignacianedit
- Licenciado en Historia (rama curricular de Prehistoria) por la Universidad del País Vasco (1996), Diplomado en Arqueo... moreLicenciado en Historia (rama curricular de Prehistoria) por la Universidad del País Vasco (1996), Diplomado en Arqueología Práctica por la Universidad de Deusto (1996) y Doctor (especialidad Prehistoria) por la Universidad del País Vasco bajo la dirección de I. Barandiarán (2002).Ha sido profesor de licenciatura (en Historia) y grado (en Historia, Historia del Arte, y Geografía e Historia) en las universidades del País Vasco (2009-2017) e Isabel I de Burgos (2017-2019), de másteres en cuaternario en la universidad del País Vasco (2009-2019) y de máster en formación del profesorado en la Isabel I (2016-2018), y de doctorado en las universidades Rovira y Virgili de Tarragona (2004-2007) y País Vasco (2004-2009). Ha realizado estancias de investigación en Francia (Universidad de Bordeaux -1998-), Portugal (Parque Arqueológico del Valle de Côa -1999- e Instituto Politécnico de Tomar -1998-), República Checa (Laboratorio de Paleolítico y Paleoetnografía del Instituto de las Ciencias Checas -2002 a 2004-) y España (Universidad Rovira y Virgili -1997 y 1998-).Su ámbito de investigación se centra principalmente en el arte prehistórico, tanto paleolítico como postpaleolítico. Sus líneas de trabajo actuales preferentes se concretan en:•Origen de la conducta simbólica y del grafismo.•El desarrollo del arte paleolítico y el fin del estilo paleolítico.•Aplicación de técnicas cronométricas al estudio de arte prehistórico.•Territorialidad y movilidad de los grupos cazadores-recolectores.•Arte prehistórico como información paleoetnográfica.•Conservación, gestión y puesta en valor del Patrimonio Rupestre.Ha desarrollo trabajos arqueológicos y de conservación en España (entre otros, Ekain, Danbolinzulo, Altamira, Covalanas, La Haza, El Castillo, La Pasiega, Las Chimeneas, Coimbre, Covaciella, El Bosque, Venta Laperra, Los Casares, Ardales, etc.), Francia (Merveilles), Portugal (Foz Côa y Escoural), Italia (Grotta di Genovessi), República Checa (Dolní Vestonice y Paulov) y Timor (prospección de arte rupestre en el área de Tutuala). Su actividad de investigación ha sido reconocida positivamente por la ANECA con tres tramos de investigación (sexenios 1997-2005, 2006-2011 y 2012-2017). Está acreditado por la ANECA, en 2015, como profesor ayudante doctor, profesor de universidad privada y profesor contratado doctor. Además de la actividad académica y de investigación, ha desarrollo actividad laboral en el ámbito de la gestión del Patrimonio, trabajando como técnico superior en el Centro Nacional de Arte Rupestre del Ministerio de Cultura Portugués (1999 y 2000) y como Coordinador de Centros Culturales del Gobierno de Cantabria (2006 a 2010). Ha sido miembro de diversas comisiones y órganos de asesoramiento sobre patrimonio (comunidades de País Vasco, Cantabria, Asturias y Extremadura, Ministerio de Cultura del Gobierno de España) y miembro del Patronato del Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de la cueva de Altamira (2010-2012). Por último, destaca su actividad de transferencia, habiendo escrito varias guías de cuevas con arte rupestre y diversos libros de divulgación, así como numerosas charlas de divulgación científica y habiendo comisariado exposiciones para el Gobierno de Cantabria, la Fundación Atapuerca y el Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de la cueva de Altamira.edit
Research Interests:
The hand stencils of European Paleolithic art tend to be considered of pre-Magdalenian age and scholars have generally assigned them to the Gravettian period. At El Castillo Cave, application of U-series dating to calcite accretions has... more
The hand stencils of European Paleolithic art tend to be considered of pre-Magdalenian age and scholars have generally assigned them to the Gravettian period. At El Castillo Cave, application of U-series dating to calcite accretions has established a minimum age of 37,290 years for underlying red hand stencils, implying execution in the earlier part of the Aurignacian if not beforehand. Together with the series of red disks, one of which has a minimum age of 40,800 years, these motifs lie at the base of the El Castillo parietal stratigraphy. The similarity in technique and colour support the notion that both kinds of artistic manifestations are synchronic and define an initial, non-figurative phase of European cave art. However, available data indicate that hand stencils continued to be painted subsequently. Currently, the youngest, reliably dated examples fall in the Late Gravettian, approximately 27,000 years ago.
Research Interests: Ancient History, Cognitive Science, Archaeology, Art, Palaeolithic Archaeology, and 15 morePaleolithic Europe, Medicine, Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition, Prehistoric Rock Art, Cave, Rock Art, Humans, Chronology, Ice Age Cave Art, Paleolithic Art, Origin of symbolic behaviour, Caves, Radiometric Dating, Cave art, and Anthropological Sciences
Engraving sites are rare in mainland and Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) where painted art dominates the prehistoric artistic record. Here we report two new engraving sites from the Tutuala region of Timor-Leste comprising mostly humanoid... more
Engraving sites are rare in mainland and Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) where painted art dominates the prehistoric artistic record. Here we report two new engraving sites from the Tutuala region of Timor-Leste comprising mostly humanoid forms carved into speleothem columns in rock-shelters. Engraved face motifs have previously been reported from Lene Hara Cave in this same region, and one was dated to the Pleistocene–Holocene transition using the Uranium–Thorium method. We discuss the engravings in relation to changes in technology and material culture that took place in the terminal Pleistocene and early Holocene archaeological records in this region of Timor as well as neighbouring islands. We suggest that the engravings may have been produced as markers of territorial and social identity within the context of population expansion and greater inter-group contacts at this time.
Research Interests:
Paint technology, namely paint preparation and application procedures, is an important aspect of painting traditions. With the expansion of archaeometric studies and in situ nondestructive analytical methods, a renewal of technological... more
Paint technology, namely paint preparation and application procedures, is an important aspect of painting traditions. With the expansion of archaeometric studies and in situ nondestructive analytical methods, a renewal of technological studies is being observed in rock art. In situ analyses have several limitations that are widely discussed in the literature, however.
It is not yet clear whether they provide accurate information on paint technology, except under certain conditions. Here, we evaluated digital microscopic and pXRF in situ analyses for the characterisation of a large set of red and yellow paintings from the El Castillo cave, Cantabria, Spain. We have set experiments and used statistical methods to identify differences between paint components and determine factors impacting pXRF measurements. We found that the compositional heterogeneity of the paintings’ environment, especially variations in secondary deposits, was responsible for most of the differences observed between the pXRF signals recorded on the paintings. We concluded that the El Castillo cave environment is not suitable for non-destructive technological studies, but that more favourable contexts might exist. Following previous works and our own results, we advocate a combination of both in situ and laboratory invasive analyses for the study of paint composition and paint technology. Our research protocol, based on the comparison of rock paintings, their substrate, experimental paintings and Fe-normalisation of the signals can improve the reliability of pXRF results. We also propose to include more systematic characterisation of rock wall heterogeneity and the use of microscopic analyses in non-destructive approaches.
It is not yet clear whether they provide accurate information on paint technology, except under certain conditions. Here, we evaluated digital microscopic and pXRF in situ analyses for the characterisation of a large set of red and yellow paintings from the El Castillo cave, Cantabria, Spain. We have set experiments and used statistical methods to identify differences between paint components and determine factors impacting pXRF measurements. We found that the compositional heterogeneity of the paintings’ environment, especially variations in secondary deposits, was responsible for most of the differences observed between the pXRF signals recorded on the paintings. We concluded that the El Castillo cave environment is not suitable for non-destructive technological studies, but that more favourable contexts might exist. Following previous works and our own results, we advocate a combination of both in situ and laboratory invasive analyses for the study of paint composition and paint technology. Our research protocol, based on the comparison of rock paintings, their substrate, experimental paintings and Fe-normalisation of the signals can improve the reliability of pXRF results. We also propose to include more systematic characterisation of rock wall heterogeneity and the use of microscopic analyses in non-destructive approaches.
Research Interests:
Desde 2016 se ha retomado la investigación de los principales yacimientos arqueológicos de Ojo Guareña, una de las mayores cavidades europeas, cuyo objetivo es establecer una secuencia cronológica de la ocupación del espacio subterráneo.... more
Desde 2016 se ha retomado la investigación de los principales yacimientos arqueológicos de Ojo Guareña, una de las mayores cavidades europeas, cuyo objetivo es establecer una secuencia cronológica de la ocupación del espacio subterráneo. Las nuevas dataciones arqueológicas recientemente publicadas sobre los santuarios de arte rupestre de la Sala Cartón y Sala de las Pinturas (Ortega et al., 2020), así como del entorno de la Sala y Galerías de las Huellas (Ortega et al., 2021), permiten confirmar la reiteración de las exploraciones prehistóricas, documentando incluso incursiones en fases históricas, en este complejo de cavidades. Este artículo es una puesta en común de los resultados de las investigaciones en dichos sectores, insertadas en el contexto general de Ojo Guareña.
Research Interests: Archaeology, Prehistoric Archaeology, Rock Art (Archaeology), Prehistoric Europe (Archaeology), Prehistoric Art, and 8 moreEuropean Prehistory (Archaeology), Prehistory, Prehistoric Rock Art, Ice Age Cave Art, Prehistoric Archeology, Paleolithic Archaeology, Radiocarbon Dating (Archaeology), and Arte Rupestre Prehistórico
Cave paintings are a fascinating legacy of prehistoric human groups, providing evidence of artistic and creative traditions of past human societies. Thus, cave paintings have been subject of many studies about motifs and their style,... more
Cave paintings are a fascinating legacy of prehistoric human groups, providing evidence of artistic and creative traditions of past human societies. Thus, cave paintings have been subject of many studies about motifs and their style, arrangements, superposition or pigment use. There were also attempts to establish a chronology of cave art, but this was hindered by a lack of suitable dating methods and absence of a stratigraphic relationship to excavated archaeology in the same cave. The advent of AMS 14C dating made it possible to obtain maximum ages for some motifs which were painted with organic pigments. This provided age control for a small fraction of cave paintings and was a huge step forward in cave art research. 14C dates on cave paintings and dated portable art, recovered from excavations, were combined with stylistic arguments to establish a “chronology” of cave art. The style has severe limitations
to be used to define the age of a painting, because the degree of synchronous morpho-stylistic variability is unknown. However, stylistic arguments – in some cases combined with assumed correlation with excavated
levels – have still been used to ’date’ many paintings, in most cases with inherent circular reasoning (von Petzinger and Nowell, 2011). Thus, reliable
knowledge about timing and evolution of rock art is still extremely limited and we contribute to the chronology of cave paintings by dating of associated speleothem formations.
to be used to define the age of a painting, because the degree of synchronous morpho-stylistic variability is unknown. However, stylistic arguments – in some cases combined with assumed correlation with excavated
levels – have still been used to ’date’ many paintings, in most cases with inherent circular reasoning (von Petzinger and Nowell, 2011). Thus, reliable
knowledge about timing and evolution of rock art is still extremely limited and we contribute to the chronology of cave paintings by dating of associated speleothem formations.
Research Interests: Rock Art (Archaeology), Palaeolithic Archaeology, Cognitive archaeology, Paleolithic Europe, Archaeology of Caves and Caverns (Archaeospeleology), and 8 moreNeanderthals (Palaeolithic Archaeology), Prehistoric Rock Art, Rock Art, Middle Paleolithic, Ice Age Cave Art, Neanderthals, Paleolithic Archaeology, and Rock art research
Research Interests: Archaeology and Antiquity
The objective of the paper is to determine convergences or divergences in the placement of cave art through the combined study of parietal art and the specific space in which it was executed. The proposed methodology is based on the... more
The objective of the paper is to determine convergences or divergences in the placement of cave art through the combined study of parietal art and the specific space in which it was executed. The proposed methodology is based on the definition of the concepts of graphic space, visibility, access and capacity. Through these, a series of variables have been created to analyse in the cave: the presence of an archaeological context, the specific location of the figures, divided into three levels of study –graphic unit, panel and topographic unit–, the cave transit, the selected spaces and the potential visibility and observer capacity at each level. This methodology has been applied to Chufín Cave (Cantabria, Spain). By studying the location of the dif- ferent panels, two potential uses for the cave were determined: some panels are located on highly visible surfaces in large spaces of the cave using the techniques of deep engraving and drawing with red pigments. In contrast, other panels are situated in low visibility areas of more difficult access, with the technique of shallow engraving. This evidence might point towards a more widespread use of cave art in the first case, possibly including all the community, and a restricted use in the second case.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The comprehensive study of spaces decorated during the Palaeolithic is able to obtain information about visits to the sites and their uses. However, it is essential to determine the temporal relationship between the different forms of... more
The comprehensive study of spaces decorated during the Palaeolithic is able to obtain information about visits to the sites and their uses. However, it is essential to determine the temporal relationship between the different forms of archaeological evidence and not assume their synchronicity with the parietal art. Therefore, numerical dates are necessary. 14C-AMS dates for the art and other evidence in the Sala de las Pinturas in Ojo Guareña Cave have documented discontinuous human visits to the site from 13,000 to~1000 cal BP, in the course of at least five phases. This new information implies the observation and probably the use of the Palaeolithic art by farming communities after its creation by hunter-gatherers. The fact that decorated caves were used repeatedly adds a new dimension to the study of Palaeolithic art, which may have been reused in a time after it was produced, and underscores the need to date archaeological events to understand the degree of synchronicity and/or diachronicity of the human actions.
Research Interests: Archaeology, Prehistoric Archaeology, Rock Art (Archaeology), Palaeolithic Archaeology, Neolithic Archaeology, and 12 moreBronze Age Europe (Archaeology), Neolithic & Chalcolithic Archaeology, Chalcolithic Archaeology, Neolithic Europe, Paleolithic Europe, Prehistoric Art, Prehistory, Prehistoric Rock Art, Ice Age Cave Art, Prehistoric Archeology, Middle Aged, and Symbolic Behavior
The distribution of known Pleistocene painted rock art in Island South-east Asia is currently limited to islands on the northern dispersal route to Australia. Here we report the discovery of at least 16 hand stencil motifs in Lene Hara... more
The distribution of known Pleistocene painted rock art in Island South-east Asia is currently limited to islands on the northern dispersal route to Australia. Here we report the discovery of at least 16 hand stencil motifs in Lene Hara Cave, Timor-Leste; a site on the alternate southern arc route. Superimposition, preservation state, differing ‘canvas’ materials (i.e. painted surfaces), and the location of the stencils in the internal (darker) part of the cave chamber together suggest that they represent an independent artistic phase that pre-dates the Holocene Austronesian Painting Tradition. The stencils are therefore recognised as a chronologically distinct painted rock art tradition, with a Pleistocene age considered most likely. Such findings have important implications for our understandings on the origins and spread of art in south-east Asia.
Research Interests:
Libro sobre métodos y técnicas en arqueología prehistórica que se estructura en los siguientes capítulos: La prospección de superficie, La excavación arqueológica, La datación por carbono-14, La datación por las series de Uranio, La... more
Libro sobre métodos y técnicas en arqueología prehistórica que se estructura en los siguientes capítulos: La prospección de superficie, La excavación arqueológica, La datación por carbono-14, La datación por las series de Uranio, La datación por Resonancia Paramagnética Electrónica (ESR), La datación por luminiscencia de sedimentos arqueológicos, Paleomagnetismo, La reconstrucción de los medios físicos y el análisis de paleopaisajes, Estratigrafía y análisis de facies, La Estratigrafía Analítica, La micromorfología de suelos, La arqueología del paisaje: análisis macro y meso-espacial, Análisis micro-espacial: áreas domésticas, variabilidad funcional y patrones temporales, Arqueopalinología, Fitolitos, almidones y fibras, Macrorrestos vegetales arqueológicos, Paleoecología, Arqueozoología, Tafonomía, Antropología física, Paleogenética humana, Materias primas líticas, Tipología y tecnología lítica, Tipología analítica, El análisis funcional de los instrumentos prehistóricos, Producciones óseas funcionales y decorativas, Producciones cerámicas, Arqueometalurgia, Arte prehistórico, Arqueología experimental y Etnoarqueología.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
https://elpais.com/ciencia/2020-05-21/el-indescifrable-origen-de-la-primera-obra-de-arte.html Unas manos pintadas en una cueva de Timor Oriental aumentan el misterio sobre dónde y cuándo surgieron las primeras expresiones artísticas de... more
https://elpais.com/ciencia/2020-05-21/el-indescifrable-origen-de-la-primera-obra-de-arte.html
Unas manos pintadas en una cueva de Timor Oriental aumentan el misterio sobre dónde y cuándo surgieron las primeras expresiones artísticas de nuestra especie, cuenta el prehistoriador Marcos García-Díez
Unas manos pintadas en una cueva de Timor Oriental aumentan el misterio sobre dónde y cuándo surgieron las primeras expresiones artísticas de nuestra especie, cuenta el prehistoriador Marcos García-Díez