INTRODUCTION
Schiff bases and related N-ligands attract considerable interest and play an important role in the development of the chemistry of chelate systems as potential ligands towards a large number of metal ions1–8. Growing interest in the synthesis of such a type of compounds are due to their potential application as catalyst in many organic transformations9–12 and diverse useful properties, such as solvatochromism13, molecular switching14,15, crystal engineering16, etc. Noncovalent interactions (hydrogen, aerogen, halogen, chalcogen, pnictogen, tetrel and icosagen bonds, as well as cation-π, anion-π, lone pair-π, π-π stacking, agostic, pseudo-agostic, anagostic, dispersion-driven, lipophilic, etc.) concern weak forces of attraction formed between different molecules (intermolecular) or fragments of the same molecule (intramolecular). While these weak interactions were firstly taken into consideration by van der Waals in 1873 17, the understanding of their crucial role in synthesis, catalysis, crystal engineering, pharmaceutical design, molecular biology, molecular recognition, materials, etc. has been increasingly explored in the last few decades.
Herein we found strong charge assisted hydrogen bond and halogen bonding in (E)-5-phenyl-3-((4-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)amino)thiazolidin-2-iminium bromide (scheme 1).
EXPERIMENTAL
NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker Avance II + 300 (UltraShield™ Magnet) spectrometer operating at 300.130 and 75.468 MHz for proton and carbon-13, respectively. All NMR spectra are reported in parts per million (ppm, d) relative to tetramethylsilane (Me4Si) for 1H and 13C NMR spectra, with the residual solvent proton and carbon resonances used as internal standards. Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hertz (Hz), and integrations are reported as number of protons.
The following abbreviations are used to describe peak patterns: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, m = multiplet, br = broad. 1H and 13C NMR chemical shift assignments are supported by data obtained from 1H-1H COSY, 1H-13C HMQC, and 1H-13C. Electrospray mass spectra (ESI-MS) were run with an ion-trap instrument (Varian 500-MS LC Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer) equipped with an electrospray ion source. For electrospray ionization, the drying gas and flow rate were optimized according to the particular sample with 35 p.s.i. nebulizer pressure. Scanning was performed from m/z 0 to 1100 in methanol solution. The compounds were observed in the positive mode (capillary voltage = 80-105 V).
For the molecular structure of title compound, H atoms were located in the difference Fourier map, refined with fixed individual displacement parameters, using a riding model with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (for aromatic rings), 0.92 Å; 0.96 Å (for CH3, CH2), with U(H) values of 1.2Ueq(C, N) (for CH in aromatic rings and -NH2+), and 1.5Ueq(C, O) (for CH3 and -OH). Solvent molecules were restrained using Rigid body (RIGU) restrains (O1S, C1S). trifluoromethyl moiety (-CF3) was restrained using SADI. All sigma for 1-2 distances of 0.004 Å and sigma for 1-3 distances of 0.004 Å. Finally the several disordered -CF3, was treated with FVAR and SUMP.
X-ray diffraction patterns of title compound were collected using a Bruker SMART APEX-II CCD area detector equipped with graphite-monochromated Mo-Κα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at room temperature. The diffraction frames were integrated using the APEX3 package18. The structure of were solved by intrinsic phasing19 using the OLEX 2 program20.
The structure was then refined with full-matrix least-square methods based on F2 (SHELXL-2014)19. For C14H8BrCl2FN2, non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atoms were included in their calculated positions, assigned fixed isotropic thermal parameters and constrained to ride on their parent atoms. A summary of the details about crystal data, collection parameters and refinement are documented in Table 1, and additional crystallographic details are in the CIF files. ORTEP views were drawn using OLEX2 software20. CCDC 1912059 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.as.uk/data_request/cif.
Empirical Formula | C18H21BrF3N3O2S |
Formula mass, g mol−1 | 480.35 |
Collection T, K | 296.15 |
crystal system | monoclinic |
space group | P21/n |
a (Å) | 5.7935(3) |
b (Å) | 11.6768(9) |
c (Å) | 31.310(2) |
β(°) | 95.259(4) |
V (Å3) | 2109.2(2) |
Z | 4 |
ρcalcd (gcm−3) | 1.513 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.52 × 0.31 × 0.17 |
F(000) | 976.0 |
abs coeff (mm−1) | 2.092 |
2θ range (°) | 2.612 – 56.186 |
range h,k,l | -7/7, -14/15, -41/41 |
No. total refl. | 16972 |
No. unique refl. | 5122 [Rint = 0.0504, Rsigma = 0.0613] |
Comp. θmax (%) | 99.5/28.09 |
Data/Restraints/Parameters | 5122/41/279 |
Final R [I>2σ(I)] | R1 = 0.0783, wR2 = 0.1938 |
R indices (all data) | R1 = 0.1057, wR2 = 0.2136 |
Goodness of fit / F2 | 1.132 |
Largest diff. Peak/hole (eÅ−3) | 1.52/-0.86 |
To the solution of 1 mmol of 3-amino-5-phenylthiazolidin-2-iminium bromide in 20 mL ethanol was added 1 mmol of 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde and refluxed for 2 hours. Then the reaction mixture was cooled down. Reaction products was precipitated from reaction mixture as a colorless single crystals, collected by filtration and washed with cold acetone.Yield 73%. Mp 231°C. Anal. Calcd. for C17H15BrF3N3S (Mr =430.29): C, 47.45; H, 3.51; N, 9.77. Found: C, 47.40; H, 3.48; N, 9.71 %. 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6): 4.58 (k, 1H, CH2, 3JH-H=6.6); 4,89 (t, 1H, CH2, 3JH-H=8.4); 5.60 (t, 1H, CH-Ar, 3JH-H=7.5); 7.39-8.29 (m, 9H, 9Ar-H); 8.51 (s, 1H, CH=); 10.51 (s, 1H, NH=). 13C NMR(75MHz, DMSO-d6): 45.45, 56.03, 125.74, 125.80, 127.86, 128.95, 129.15, 129.22, 130.72, 131.14, 136.85, 137.50, 149.54, 168.62. MS (ESI), m/z: 350.38 [C17H15F3N3S]+ and 79.88 Br−.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The cation structure corresponds to the E isomer in the solid state. All the distances and angles are normal21,22. The bond lengths range between measured C-C and C=N values for single and double bonds in C4-C5, C5-N1 and N1-N2 are slightly larger than the reported for similar organic compounds23–25, depicted a potential electronic disconnection between the rings in the cation of the title compound.
In the cation of the title salt, the central thiazolidine ring (S1/N2/C1-C3) adopts an envelope conformation with puckering parameters 0.300(6)Å, and φ(2)= 325,1(12)°. The dihedral angle between the mean plane of the central thiazolidine ring and the (4-trifluoromethyl)benzylidene ring (C5-C10) is 0.4(3) while this plane make a angle 10(2)° with the phenyl ring. The N2-N1-C4-C5 bridge that links the thiazolidine and (4-trifluoromethyl)benzylidene ring is 0.40 (3)° (see tables 3 and 4).
Atoms | x | y | z | U(eq) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Br1 | 14384.5(10) | 2642.6(5) | 7630.0(2) | 31.7(2) |
S1 | 5698(2) | 5952.5(13) | 7912.1(4) | 28.4(3) |
F1A | 13725(9) | 2291(6) | 5137.4(16) | 72(2) |
F2A | 9940(40) | 1910(20) | 4957(6) | 92(6) |
F3A | 11190(20) | 3418(9) | 4903(2) | 97(4) |
F1B | 13110(80) | 3170(50) | 5005(14) | 72(2) |
F2B | 9970(50) | 2870(30) | 4861(8) | 97(4) |
F3B | 10770(40) | 1435(13) | 5094(5) | 92(6) |
O1S | 4010(20) | 6087(10) | 6154(2) | 158(6) |
N1 | 8072(8) | 4562(4) | 6923.8(13) | 24.0(10) |
N2 | 7800(8) | 4922(4) | 7335.3(15) | 24.8(10) |
N3 | 4486(9) | 5894(5) | 7069.8(16) | 35.7(12) |
C1 | 9231(9) | 4612(5) | 7724.9(17) | 24.5(11) |
C3 | 5958(9) | 5579(5) | 7384.4(17) | 25.6(11) |
C4 | 9802(10) | 3931(5) | 6872.6(18) | 26.0(11) |
C5 | 10177(9) | 3531(5) | 6437.9(16) | 25.2(11) |
C6 | 12186(10) | 2943(5) | 6368.8(18) | 31.9(13) |
C7 | 12622(11) | 2597(6) | 5964.3(19) | 35.2(14) |
C8 | 11035(11) | 2845(6) | 5616.9(18) | 38.1(15) |
C9 | 8995(11) | 3414(6) | 5682.1(19) | 40.3(16) |
C10 | 8574(11) | 3770(6) | 6086.6(19) | 37.7(15) |
C11 | 11509(12) | 2527(7) | 5183(2) | 55(2) |
C12 | 9042(10) | 5043(6) | 8521.8(18) | 35.1(14) |
C13 | 11095(10) | 4464(6) | 8637.2(18) | 35.9(14) |
C14 | 11758(12) | 4214(7) | 9060(2) | 49.8(19) |
C15 | 10333(14) | 4513(8) | 9372(2) | 59(2) |
C16 | 8294(13) | 5090(7) | 9259(2) | 49.4(19) |
C17 | 7633(11) | 5337(6) | 8841.2(19) | 39.4(15) |
C2A | 8686(13) | 5497(7) | 8052(2) | 25.9(15) |
C2B | 7620(30) | 4718(18) | 8105(6) | 25.9(15) |
C1S | 3780(20) | 5914(9) | 5728(3) | 88(4) |
O2S | 9430(30) | 7111(8) | 6313(3) | 169(6) |
Atoms | Angle/° | Atoms | Angle/° | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C3 | S1 | C2A | 89.5(3) | F2A | C11 | F3A | 91.6(13) |
C3 | S1 | C2B | 90.7(6) | F2A | C11 | C8 | 117.5(11) |
C4 | N1 | N2 | 117.1(5) | F3A | C11 | C8 | 112.2(7) |
N1 | N2 | C1 | 127.0(4) | F1B | C11 | F3B | 131(2) |
C3 | N2 | N1 | 116.4(4) | F1B | C11 | C8 | 116(2) |
C3 | N2 | C1 | 116.5(4) | F2B | C11 | F1B | 87.5(19) |
N2 | C1 | C2A | 105.1(5) | F2B | C11 | F3B | 87.3(17) |
N2 | C1 | C2B | 106.3(8) | F2B | C11 | C8 | 116.8(15) |
N2 | C3 | S1 | 113.3(4) | F3B | C11 | C8 | 110.2(9) |
N3 | C3 | S1 | 123.1(4) | C13 | C12 | C17 | 118.6(6) |
N3 | C3 | N2 | 123.6(5) | C13 | C12 | C2A | 116.6(5) |
N1 | C4 | C5 | 119.1(5) | C13 | C12 | C2B | 118.9(9) |
C6 | C5 | C4 | 119.9(5) | C17 | C12 | C2A | 124.0(6) |
C6 | C5 | C10 | 118.8(5) | C17 | C12 | C2B | 111.8(9) |
C10 | C5 | C4 | 121.3(5) | C14 | C13 | C12 | 120.8(6) |
C7 | C6 | C5 | 121.2(5) | C13 | C14 | C15 | 119.6(6) |
C6 | C7 | C8 | 119.7(5) | C16 | C15 | C14 | 119.8(6) |
C7 | C8 | C11 | 120.6(6) | C17 | C16 | C15 | 120.7(6) |
C9 | C8 | C7 | 119.8(5) | C16 | C17 | C12 | 120.5(6) |
C9 | C8 | C11 | 119.6(6) | C1 | C2A | S1 | 106.9(5) |
C10 | C9 | C8 | 120.4(5) | C1 | C2A | C12 | 113.0(6) |
C9 | C10 | C5 | 120.1(5) | C12 | C2A | S1 | 111.4(5) |
F1A | C11 | F3A | 99.4(7) | C1 | C2B | S1 | 101.0(10) |
F1A | C11 | C8 | 114.7(6) | C12 | C2B | S1 | 109.9(11) |
F2A | C11 | F1A | 116.9(13) | C12 | C2B | C1 | 110.8(12) |
Atoms | Length/Å | Atoms | Length/Å | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | C3 | 1.729(5) | C4 | C5 | 1.474(7) |
S1 | C2A | 1.826(8) | C5 | C6 | 1.386(7) |
S1 | C2B | 1.89(2) | C5 | C10 | 1.401(8) |
F1A | C11 | 1.334(8) | C6 | C7 | 1.375(8) |
F2A | C11 | 1.316(12) | C7 | C8 | 1.389(8) |
F3A | C11 | 1.362(9) | C8 | C9 | 1.388(8) |
F1B | C11 | 1.356(16) | C8 | C11 | 1.458(7) |
F2B | C11 | 1.347(14) | C9 | C10 | 1.376(8) |
F3B | C11 | 1.366(12) | C12 | C13 | 1.387(8) |
O1S | C1S | 1.344(11) | C12 | C17 | 1.391(8) |
N1 | N2 | 1.378(6) | C12 | C2A | 1.560(9) |
N1 | C4 | 1.266(7) | C12 | C2B | 1.53(2) |
N2 | C1 | 1.456(7) | C13 | C14 | 1.374(8) |
N2 | C3 | 1.335(7) | C14 | C15 | 1.381(9) |
N3 | C3 | 1.296(7) | C15 | C16 | 1.377(10) |
C1 | C2A | 1.508(9) | C16 | C17 | 1.359(8) |
C1 | C2B | 1.581(19) |
In the crystal N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds link the components into a bi-dimensional network with the cations and anions stacked parallel to plane 101. The weak interactions are mainly constituted by H⋯F, Η⋯π and Η⋯Br. Moreover, In crystal structure it is found strong charge assisted hydrogen-halogen bonding and, intermolecular hydrogen-π bonding interaction along to [010] direction with 2.40 Å (Figure 2 and table 5)
D | H | A | d(D-H)/Å | d(H-A)/Å | d(D-A)/Å | D-H-A/° |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O1S | H1S | O2S1 | 0.84 | 2.21 | 2.991(16) | 154.8 |
N3 | H3A | O1S | 0.88 | 2.10 | 2.863(8) | 144.7 |
1-1+X,+Y,+Z
A Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to verify the contributions of the different intermolecular interactions. This analysis was used to investigate the presence of hydrogen bonds and intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure. The Hirshfeld surface analysis 26 was generated by CrystalExplorer 17.5 27 and comprised dnorm surface plots and 2D (two-dimensional) fingerprint plots 28. The plots of the Hirshfeld surface confirms the presence of the non-covalent interaction described below (Figure 3.), taking account the several positional disorder in the molecular structure
Contact | Contribution (%) |
---|---|
Br⋯H | 6.8% |
Br⋯N | 0.9% |
Br⋯C | 0.7% |
F⋯F | 0.5% |
F⋯O | 0.1% |
F⋯H | 24.5% |
F⋯C | 1.0% |
O⋯H | 2.9% |
O⋯C | 0.3% |
H⋯H | 32.8% |
H⋯N | 3.8% |
Η ⋯C (π - H) | 19.3% |
*Reciprocal contacts
The weak intermolecular interactions are mainly constituted by H⋯F, Η⋯π and H⋯Br, with a contribution of 24.5, 19.3 and 6.8%, respectively. Where the reciprocal contacts appear as a wide stain for H⋯F, with de + di≃ 2.8 Å, for H⋯Br as a sharp spike with de + di≃ 2.3 Å and, π ⋯H as asymmetrical wings with de + di≃ 3.0. Å, according to the interaction depicted in figure 2. This type of weak interactions are also observed in isostructural compounds recently reported23–25.
CONCLUSIONS.
In this study we offer the report of synthesis, characterization and structural studies of the title compounds, showing the E isomer in the solid state. The weaks intermolecular interactions, were successfully verified with Hirshfeld surface analyses, being mainly constituted by H⋯F, Η⋯π and H⋯Br, with a contribution of 24.5, 19.3 and 6.8%, respectively. The chemistry of this compound allow postulate as a good candidate for several applications such as potential biological, pharmacological and analytical applications, moreover heterocyclic amines are also widely used in the synthesis of Schiff bases, which provide different kinds of noncovalent interactions.