Dimensions and components of information economy as a novel economy: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i1.20415Keywords:
Information economy, Dimensions and components, Novel economy.Abstract
Objective of the Study: Despite the critical role and impact of the information economy in the modern world, the dimensions and components of this multi-faceted concept remain understudied and unknown. The complexity and vagueness of information economy and its dimensions has made it challenging, especially for developing countries, to create value and wealth from the appropriate usage of information. This study aims to identify the dimensions and components of the information economy at the micro and macro level.
Methodology/Approach: A systematic review guided by PRISMA recommendations was carried out in which 20 papers that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Emerald, Scopus, Web of Science and Econlit databases were searched to find relevant English documents.
Originality/Relevance: This study conceptualizes and determines the dimensions and components of information economy through a systematic review of the literature.
Main Results: The analysis determined eight themes (i.e., dimensions) for the information economy, including human capital, economic factors, governing laws and regulations, political factors, information and communication technology, cultural factors, stakeholders, and information. These themes had a total of 15 sub-themes and 60 codes.
Theoretical/Methodological Contribution: This study conceptualizes information economy by identifying and defining its various dimensions and components. The results can be used to develop information economy strategies at the managerial level, especially in developing countries.
Downloads
References
Alvarez, L., & Luis, F. (2016). Assembling Digital Economies: Geographic Information Markets and Intellectual Property Regimes in the United States and the European Union. (10118936 Ph.D.). University of California, Los Angeles, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1795521010?accountid=34373. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
Alvarez Leon, L. F. (2016). Assembling Digital Economies: Geographic Information Markets and Intellectual Property Regimes in the United States and the European Union. (10118936 Ph.D.). University of California, Los Angeles, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1795521010?accountid=34373. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
Arefeh, M. (2016). Move Toward Economic Globalization with a Scientist. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 467-479.https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30070-3
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Asongu, S. A., & Andrés, A. R. (2019). Trajectories of knowledge economy in SSA and MENA countries. Technology in Society, 101119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.002
Ba, S., & Nault, B. R. (2017). Emergent themes in the interface between economics of information systems and management of technology. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 652-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12644
Babazade, M., & M, V. (2016). The effect of information and communication trade on economic growth in Iran and selected developing countries. Paper presented at the fourth national conference on management, economics and accountingEast Azarbaijan industrial management organization, Iran.Tabriz.
Baseri, B., & Kia, M. (2011). The Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Based Economy components on Economic Growth in Some Selected Countries. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 16(47),1-29.
Billon, M., Lera-Lopez, F., & Marco, R. (2016). ICT use by households and firms in the EU: links and determinants from a multivariate perspective. Review of World Economics, 152(4), 629-654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-016-0259-8
Bolhari., & Mosavi Jahromi. (2016). The Role of information technology in revealing market informati. Paper presented at the Symmetric and asymmetric information, Tehra.:Samt:29-85.
Carayannis Elias, G., Ferreira João, J. M., Jalali, M. S., & Ferreira Fernando, A. F. (2018). MCDA in knowledge-based economies: Methodological developments and real world applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.028
Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 67(12), 1291-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
De La Paz-Marín, M., Gutiérrez, P. A., & Hervás-Martínez, C. (2015). Classification of countries' progress toward a knowledge economy based on machine learning classification techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 562-572. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.008
Eltemasi, M. (2015). Information economy based on knowledge organization systems, with emphasis on Folksonomy: dissertation of academic libraries. Information Sciences & Technology, 30(4), 923-937.
Emadzadeh, M., & Shahnazi, R. A. (2008). A Study of Fundamental and Indices of Knowledge Based Economy (Comparing Iran with Three Groups Candidate Countries). Economic Research, 7(4), 143--175.
Engelbrecht, H. J. (2015). Information, capital, well-being. Prometheus (United Kingdom), 33(4), 347-359. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/08109028.2016.1194007
Fox, R. (2018). Information economy. Digital Library Perspectives. Digital Library Perspectives, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2017-0040
Gladilin, A. V., Dotdueva, Z. S., Klimovskikh, Y. A., Labovskaya, Y. V., & Sharunova, E. V. (2018). Establishment of information economy under the influence of scientific and technical progress. Paper presented at the Perspectives on the use of New Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Modern Economy.Springer.pp:46-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90835-9_6
Hayriye, A. (1999). The Characteristics of The Information Economy. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(3), 120-140.
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 1-214.
Mohaghegh, A. (2016). Move Toward Economic Globalization with a Scientist. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 467-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30070-3
MohammadAfshar, A., Hoque, M. R., & Alam, K. (2018). An empirical investigation of the relationship between e-government development and the digital economy: the case of Asian countries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 1176-1200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0477
Nadezhda, Nagovitsyna, E., Lapteva, I., Shchinova, R. A., & Koikova, T. (2018). The necessity for developing the integrated system of economic information on the bank services market in the conditions of globalization. Espacios, 39(28(
Niyato, D., Lu, X., Wang, P., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2016). Economics of Internet of Things: An information market approach. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(4), 136-145. https://doi.org/doi:10.1109/MWC.2016.7553037
Patricia Ordóñez de, P., Lytras, M. D., Visvizi, A., & Zhang, X. (2019). Opportunities for information technologies and knowledge management to answer emerging challenges for manufacturing and services industries in the digital economy. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 29(1), 3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20786
Popova, E. A., Medyakova, E. M., & Martemyanova, Z. S. (2018). Improving the Staff Development Institutions Under Digital Economy Conditions. In Prague: Central Bohemia University (Vol. 6, pp. 399-404). https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v6.1189
Pressman, S. (2013). Fifty major economists: USA & canada:Routledge.p:15-19
Raghfar, H., Shahabadi, A., & Alizadeh, S. (2018). The Effects of Knowledge-Based Economy's Components on Entrepreneurship in a Group of Selected Countries. Tahghighate Eghtesadi, 53(123), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.22059/JTE.2017.235216.1007617
Titova, O. V., Kostyukova, E. I., Boboshko, N. M., & Drachena, I. P. (2019). New Types of Taxes and Forms of Taxation in the Conditions of Information Economy: Perspectives of Optimization. In Optimization of the Taxation System: Preconditions, Tendencies and Perspectives. Springer (pp. 229-235): https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01514-5_26
Vafopoulos, M. N. (2012). The web economy: goods, users, models, and policies. Michalis Vafopoulos (2012)" The Web Economy: Goods, Users, Models, and Policies", Foundations and Trends® in Web Science, 3(1-2), 1-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1800000015
Vigani, M., & Olper, A. (2013). GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information. Food Policy, 43, 32-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.08.001
Woodward, R. (2009). Woodward R. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875773
Yaghoobi, A. (2014). The Role of Information Economics on the World Economy. Rasaneh, 24(2), 71.
Zhang, J. T. (2019). Emociones y consumo de los internautas en la economía digital China. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Sobre Cuerpos Emociones Y Sociedad, (30), 89-98. Retrieved from http://www.relaces.com.ar/index.php/relaces/article/view/118/113
Zinali, M. (2018). An overview of information economics texts. Electronic Journal of Astan Quds Razavi Libraries, Museums and Documentation Organization, 9(36), 1-24. Retrieved from http://shamseh.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_58522_3d70499db770f7bb81a4659a18839431.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
