Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T07:23:23.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Memory Failures of Everyday Questionnaire (MFE): Internal Consistency and Reliability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Pedro Montejo Carrasco*
Affiliation:
Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Spain)
Mercedes Montenegro Peña
Affiliation:
Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Spain)
Manuel J. Sueiro
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Pedro Montejo Carrasco. Centro de Prevención del Deterioro Cognitivo, Instituto de Salud Pública. C/ Montesa 22, Edificio B, 28006, Madrid (Spain). Phone: +34-915886789. Fax: +34-915886793. E-mail: montejop@madrid.es

Abstract

The Memory Failures of Everyday Questionnaire (MFE) is one of the most widely-used instruments to assess memory failures in daily life. The original scale has nine response options, making it difficult to apply; we created a three-point scale (0-1-2) with response choices that make it easier to administer. We examined the two versions' equivalence in a sample of 193 participants between 19 and 64 years of age. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the version we propose were also computed in a sample of 113 people. Several indicators attest to the two forms' equivalence: the correlation between the items' means (r = .94; p < .001) and the order of the items' frequencies (r = .92; p < .001). However, the correlation between global scores on the two forms was not very high (r = .67; p < .001). The results indicate this new version has adequate reliability and internal consistency (rxx' = .83; p < .001; α = .83; p < .001) equivalent to those of the MFE 1-9. The MFE 0-2 provides a brief, simple evaluation, so we recommend it for use in clinical practice as well as research.

El Cuestionario de Fallos de Memoria de la Vida Cotidiana (MFE) es uno de los instrumentos más utilizados para valorar los olvidos cotidianos. La escala original tiene nueve opciones de respuesta lo que dificulta su aplicación; hemos elaborado una nueva escala de tres opciones de respuestas (0-1-2) más sencilla de administrar. La equivalencia entre ambas versiones se estudió en una muestra de 193 participantes de 19 a 64 años. También se estimó la fiabilidad test-retest y consistencia interna de la versión propuesta en otra muestra de 113 personas. Varios indicadores mostraron la equivalencia entre ambas formas: la correlación entre las medias de los elementos (r = .94; p < .001) y el orden de las frecuencias de los ítems (r = .92; p < .001). Sin embargo la correlación entre las puntuaciones globales de las dos formas no fue muy elevada (r = .67; p < .001). Respecto a la fiabilidad y consistencia interna de la nueva versión los resultados fueron adecuados (rxx' = .83; p < .001; α = .83; p < .001), y equivalentes a los del MFE 1-9. El MFE 0-2 ofrece un sistema de valorar breve y sencillo por lo que recomendamos su uso en la práctica clínica y en la investigación.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basset, S. S., & Folstein, M. F. (1993). Memory complaints, memory performance and psychiatric diagnosis: A community study. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 6, 105111.Google Scholar
Benedet, M. J., & Seisdedos, N. (1996). Evaluación clínica de las quejas de memoria en la vida cotidiana [Clinical evaluation of memory complaints in everyday life]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., & Powell, G. E. (1980). The subjective memory questionnaire (SMQ). An investigation into the self-reporting of “real-life” memory skills. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 177188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00946.xGoogle Scholar
Bolla, K., Lindgren, K., Bonaccorsy, C., & Bleecker, M. L. (1991). Memory complaints in older adults. Fact or fiction? Archives of Neurology, 48, 6164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1991.00530130069022Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. E., Fitzgerald, P., & Parker, K. R. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.xGoogle Scholar
Cornish, I. M. (2000). Factor structure of the Everyday Memory Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 427438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712600161916Google Scholar
Crook, T. H., Bartus, R. T., Ferris, S. H., Whitehouse, P., Cohen, G. D., & Gershon, S. (1986). Age associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria measures of clinical change. Report of a NIMH work group. Developmental europsychology, 2, 261276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565648609540348Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A., Hultsch, D. F., & Hertzog, C. (1988). The Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) Questionnaire. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 38, 671688.Google Scholar
Drysdale, K., Shores, A., & Levick, W. (2004) Use of the Everyday Memory Questionnaire with Children. Child europsychology, 10, 6775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297040490911087Google Scholar
Delgado, M. L., Fernández, S., & González-Marqués, J. (2009). Evaluación de los problemas de memoria cotidiana en personas mayores. Adaptación española del Test de Memoria Conductual Rivermead-III [Evaluation of everyday memory problems in elderly adults. The Spanish adaptation of the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test-III]. (Final disertation) Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Efklides, A., Yiultsi, E., Kangellidou, T., Kounti, F., Dina, F., & Tsolaki, M. (2002). Wechsler Memory Scale, Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test, and Everyday Memory Questionnaire in healthy adults and Alzheimer patients. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 6377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.1.63Google Scholar
Fernández Ballesteros, R., Izal, M., Montorio, I., González, J. L., & Díaz, P. (1992). Evaluación e intervención psicológica en la vejez [Psychological assessment and intervention during old age]. Barcelona, Spain: Martínez Roca.Google Scholar
Garamendi, F., Delgado, D. A., & Amaya, M. A. (2010) Programa de entrenamiento cognitivo en adultos mayores [A cognitive training program in elderly adults]. Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, 22, 2631.Google Scholar
García Martínez, J., & Sánchez–Cánovas, J. (1993). Adaptación del Cuestionario de Fallos de Memoria en la Vida Cotidiana (MFE) [Adaptation of the Memory Failures Everyday Questionnaire (MFE)]. Boletín de Psicología, 43, 89105.Google Scholar
García Martínez, J., & Sánchez–Cánovas, J. (1994). Adaptación del Cuestionario de Fallos Cognitivos de Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald, & Parkes (CFQ, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire) [Adaptation of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire by Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald & Parkes (CFQ)]. Análisis y Modificación de la conducta, 20, 727749.Google Scholar
Herrman, D. J., & Neisser, U. (1978). An Inventory of Memory Experiences. In Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Skytes, R., (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory. (pp. 3551). London, England: Academic press.Google Scholar
Jonker, C., Geerlings, M., & Schmand, B. (2000). Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A Review of clinical and population-based studies. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 893991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<983::AID-GPS238>3.0.CO;2-5Google Scholar
Landa, P. J. (2007). Taller de Entrenamiento de Memoria [Memory Training Workshop]. Vitoria, Spain: Servicios psicológicos del Servicio Vasco de Salud.Google Scholar
Montejo, P., Montenegro, M., Reinoso, A. I., de Andrés, M. E., & Claver, M.D. (2003). Manual práctico de evaluación y entrenamiento de memoria. Método UMAM. [The practical manual for assessing and training memory. The UMAM method]. (pp. 4143). Madrid, Spain: Díaz de Santos.Google Scholar
Montejo, P., Montenegro, M., Reinoso, A. I., de Andrés, M. E., & Claver, M. D. (2006). Programa de memoria. Método UMAM [Memory program. The UMAM method]. (pp. 123138). Madrid, Spain: Díaz de Santos.Google Scholar
Montejo, P., Montenegro, M., Fernández, M. A., & Maestú, F. (2011). Subjective memory complaints in the elderly: Prevalence and influence of temporal orientation, depression and quality of life in a population-based study in the city of Madrid. Aging & Mental Health, 15, 8596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.501062Google Scholar
Pearman, A. (2009). Predictors of subjective memory in young adults. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 101107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9063-1Google Scholar
Pérez, M., Pelegrina, S., Justicia, F., & Godoy, J. F. (1995). Memoria cotidiana y metamemoria en ancianos institucionalizados [Everyday memory and metamemory in institutionalized elderly adults]. Anales de Psicología, 11, 4762.Google Scholar
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment. Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56, 303308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.56.3.303Google Scholar
Quirosa, T., & López, F. J. (2009, October). Aplicación de la terapia de aceptación y compromiso a las quejas subjetivas de memoria en personas mayores de 60 años [Applying acceptance and commitment therapy to subjective memory complaints in people over 60 years of age]. Paper presented at the IX National Congress of Senior Organizations. Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
Requena, C., López, V., & Ortiz, T. (2009). Satisfacción con la vida en relación con la funcionalidad de las personas mayores activas [Life satisfaction as it relates to functioning in active older adults]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 37(2), 6167.Google Scholar
Riedel-Heller, S. G., Matschinger, H., Schork, A., & Angermeyer, M. C. (1999). Do memory complaints indicate the presence of cognitive impairment? Results of a field study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 249, 197204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004060050087Google Scholar
Riedel-Heller, S. G., Schork, A., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2000). Subjective memory loss-a sign of cognitive impairment in the elderly? An overview of the status of research. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 33, 916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003910050002Google Scholar
Rohling, M. L., Green, P., Allen, L. M., & Iverson, G. L. (2002). Depressive symptoms and neurocognitive test scores in patients passing symptom validity test. Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 17, 205222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/17.3.205Google Scholar
Royle, J., & Lincoln, N. B. (2008). The Everyday Memory Questionnaire – revised: Development of a 13-item Scale. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 114121.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280701223876Google Scholar
Sunderland, A., Harris, J., & Baddeley, A. D. (1984). Assessing everyday memory after severe head injury. In Harris, J. F. & Morris, P. E. (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions, and absent-mindedness. (pp. 193212). London, England: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Baddeley, A. (1983). Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 341357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90229-3Google Scholar
Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Gleave, J. (1984). Memory failures in everyday life following a severe head injury. Journal of Clinical europsychology, 6, 127142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401204Google Scholar
Sunderland, A., Watts, K., Baddeley, A. D., & Harris, J. E. (1986). Subjective memory assessment and test performance in elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 376384.Google Scholar
Tinson, D. J., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). Subjective memory impairment after stroke. International Disability Studies, 9, 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02599148709166217Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2004). Escala de Memoria de Wechsler-III [The Wechsler-III Memory Scale]. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar