Problemas de "topoi" en Aristóteles: notas sobre una hipótesis diacrónica

• Autores: Sara Rubinelli
• Localización: Anuario filosófico, ISSN 0066-5215, Vol. 35, Nº 73, 2002 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Los tópicos de Aristóteles (II)), págs. 367-408
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In the last fifty years a series of valuable contributions on Aristotle's Topics has helped to understand how a Topics functions in the dialectical argumentation. In contrast to this, Aristotle's topoi as set out in the Rhetoric does not seem to have received the same attention. Current opinion holds that the methodology in the Rhetoric involves two different kinds of topoi, the topoi koinoi and the ídia, considered by most scholars as idioi topoi. The problem, here, is that this distinctíon of is topoir is not supported by any passage in the Rhetoric. Aristotle never speaks of.

    This work aims to show that the term'ídia is not intended to imply'ídioi topoi. The only distinction that Aristotle introduces in the Rhetoric is that between and which also appears in the Topica and which is the consequence of a fundamental coherente in thc thcory of argumentation presented by Aristotle in the two treatises. However, the results of such investigation has revcaled that the concept of which Aristotle introduces in Rhetaric 1358 a l0 clashes with the list of topoi which appears in Rhetoric B23. In the addenda, this work addresscs this issue and make a case for the possibility that Rhetoric B23 has been originally written independently from the previous sections of the Rhetoric.